{"id":23042,"date":"2026-02-28T09:39:32","date_gmt":"2026-02-28T08:39:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/?p=23042"},"modified":"2026-02-28T09:49:34","modified_gmt":"2026-02-28T08:49:34","slug":"motoriste-sobe-to-si-neumite-klempire-vychovat-priste-se-do-ps-nepodivate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/?p=23042","title":{"rendered":"Motorist\u00e9 sob\u011b, to si neum\u00edte Klemp\u00ed\u0159e vychovat? P\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b se do PS nepod\u00edv\u00e1te!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\u010cT, jakou si vysnil Jakub \u017delezn\u00fd. Petr \u017dantovsk\u00fd m\u00e1 pro n\u011bj \u0161patn\u00e9 zpr\u00e1vy<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

28.02.2026 8:32 | Koment\u00e1\u0159<\/p>\n\n\n\n

autor: Jan Novotn\u00fd<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u00ddDEN V M\u00c9DI\u00cdCH Vl\u00e1da Petra Fialy u\u017e skon\u010dila, ale \u010cesk\u00e1 televize st\u00e1le funguje jako jej\u00ed \u201ehl\u00e1sn\u00e1 trouba\u201c. \u201eMajiteli\u201c \u010cesk\u00e9 televize jsou koncesion\u00e1\u0159i, kte\u0159\u00ed by m\u011bli rozhodovat o obsahu vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed i o tom, koho ze sv\u00fdch kapes plat\u00ed. Div\u00e1ci u\u017e maj\u00ed pln\u00e9 zuby h\u00e1dek politik\u016f na obrazovce. A nebav\u00ed je po\u0159\u00e1d poslouchat o \u010cap\u00edm hn\u00edzd\u011b.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\u010cT,
Foto: Hans \u0160tembera<\/strong>
Popisek: doc. Mgr. Petr \u017dantovsk\u00fd, Ph.D., medi\u00e1ln\u00ed analytik<\/strong><\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Medi\u00e1ln\u00ed analytik Petr \u017dantovsk\u00fd se ve sv\u00e9 pravideln\u00e9 rubrice \u201eT\u00fdden v m\u00e9di\u00edch\u201c ost\u0159e ohradil proti ned\u00e1vn\u00fdm v\u00fdrok\u016fm moder\u00e1tora Jakuba \u017delezn\u00e9ho, jen\u017e se v po\u0159adu Spotlight<\/strong><\/a> na serveru Aktu\u00e1ln\u011b.cz vyj\u00e1d\u0159il k sou\u010dasn\u00e9 situaci v \u010cesk\u00e9 televizi a srovn\u00e1val ji s obdob\u00edm televizn\u00ed krize na p\u0159elomu let 2000 a 2001. Podle \u017delezn\u00e9ho nen\u00ed v dne\u0161n\u00ed dob\u011b pravd\u011bpodobn\u00e9, \u017ee by lid\u00e9 vy\u0161li do ulic demonstrovat za ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed televizi tak, jako tomu bylo p\u0159ed \u010dtvrtstolet\u00edm. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anketa<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u017dantovsk\u00fd s t\u00edmto odhadem sice souhlas\u00ed, ale d\u016fvody vid\u00ed v naprosto odli\u0161n\u00e9m sv\u011btle. Podle analytika je t\u00e9ma televizn\u00ed st\u00e1vky z roku 2000 ji\u017e d\u00e1vno vy\u010dp\u011bl\u00e9, a to p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm proto, \u017ee tehdej\u0161\u00ed akt\u00e9\u0159i z \u0159ad zam\u011bstnanc\u016f podle n\u011bj neusilovali o svobodu slova, n\u00fdbr\u017e o vlastn\u00ed prosp\u011bch a udr\u017een\u00ed sv\u00fdch pozic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Medi\u00e1ln\u00ed expert uvedl: \u201eKa\u017ed\u00fd, kdo to pozoruje zven\u010d\u00ed nestrann\u011b a sna\u017e\u00ed se tomu porozum\u011bt, dojde v\u017edy na z\u00e1v\u011br ke zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed, \u017ee se to v t\u00e9 krizi m\u011blo tro\u0161ku jinak, ne\u017e se \u0159\u00edkalo, a \u017ee \u010cesk\u00e1 televize je dnes skute\u010dn\u011b hn\u00edzdem z\u00e1jmov\u00fdm, nikoliv hn\u00edzdem svobody slova.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kritice podrobil slova Jakuba \u017delezn\u00e9ho, \u017ee je \u010cesk\u00e1 televize v sou\u010dasnosti m\u00e1lo d\u016frazn\u00e1, m\u00e1lo \u010diteln\u00e1 a nedostate\u010dn\u011b kritick\u00e1 v\u016f\u010di politick\u00e9 sc\u00e9n\u011b. \u017delezn\u00fd se domn\u00edv\u00e1, \u017ee by div\u00e1ci ocenili podstatn\u011b bojovn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed a z\u00e1sadn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed postoj redakce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u017dantovsk\u00fd tento n\u00e1zor ozna\u010dil za \u201ep\u0159\u00e1n\u00ed, je\u017e je otcem my\u0161lenky\u201c, a za \u017eurnalistiku, kter\u00e1 odpov\u00edd\u00e1 pouze osobn\u00edmu vkusu Jakuba \u017delezn\u00e9ho. Podle analytika maj\u00ed div\u00e1ci neust\u00e1l\u00fdch politick\u00fdch dohad\u016f a h\u00e1dek, kter\u00e9 se v televizi st\u00e1le dokola om\u00edlaj\u00ed, ji\u017e \u201epln\u00e9 zuby\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Analytik d\u00e1le kritizoval redaktory za to, \u017ee pracuj\u00ed s uzav\u0159en\u00fdmi tezemi a mantrami, kter\u00e9 pouze p\u0159edkl\u00e1daj\u00ed respondent\u016fm, ani\u017e p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161ej\u00ed nov\u00e9 poznatky. Jako p\u0159\u00edklady t\u00e9mat, kter\u00e1 se neust\u00e1le opakuj\u00ed bez hlub\u0161\u00edho p\u0159\u00ednosu, zm\u00ednil kauzu \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo nebo aktivity Tomia Okamury.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eJe to takov\u00e9 pohodln\u00e9 pro ty redaktory, proto\u017ee pracuj\u00ed s n\u011bjak\u00fdmi uzav\u0159en\u00fdmi tezemi a mantrami, na kter\u00e9 maj\u00ed jednozna\u010dn\u00fd n\u00e1zor, a tak ho tedy p\u0159edkl\u00e1daj\u00ed r\u016fzn\u00fdm respondent\u016fm a tahaj\u00ed z nich rozumy, av\u0161ak opravdov\u00fd rozum v t\u011bchto p\u0159\u00edpadech t\u011b\u017eko hledat,\u201c konstatoval \u017dantovsk\u00fd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

D\u00e1le zd\u016fraznil, \u017ee role ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edho m\u00e9dia je definov\u00e1na z\u00e1konem \u010d. 483<\/strong><\/a> z roku 1991 o \u010cesk\u00e9 televizi. Jakub \u017delezn\u00fd sv\u00fdm vol\u00e1n\u00edm po v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed razanci a n\u00e1zorovosti jedn\u00e1 v p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9m rozporu s paragrafem 2 tohoto z\u00e1kona, kter\u00fd definuje posl\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 slu\u017eby.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eZejm\u00e9na \u010cesk\u00e1 televize v\u016fbec nem\u00e1 m\u00edt \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd n\u00e1zor. \u010cesk\u00e1 televize by m\u011bla slou\u017eit v\u0161em a m\u011bla by p\u0159edkl\u00e1dat r\u016fznorod\u00e9 n\u00e1zory, aby si ob\u010dan mohl ud\u011blat sv\u016fj vlastn\u00ed,\u201c uvedl \u017dantovsk\u00fd s t\u00edm, \u017ee pokud n\u011bkdo tomuto principu nerozum\u00ed, m\u011bl by se bu\u010f vr\u00e1tit do \u0161koly, nebo se k m\u00e9di\u00edm rad\u011bji nevyjad\u0159ovat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u010cT funguje jako \u201ehl\u00e1sn\u00e1 trouba\u201c Fialovy vl\u00e1dn\u00ed koalice<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

V dal\u0161\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti se \u017dantovsk\u00fd zam\u011b\u0159il na budouc\u00ed sm\u011b\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 televize a na diskuse ohledn\u011b jej\u00ed nez\u00e1vislosti v souvislosti s aktu\u00e1ln\u00ed politickou situac\u00ed. Analytik kriticky hodnotil obsah podcastu \u201eDobrovsk\u00fd a \u0160\u00eddlo<\/strong><\/a>\u201c, ve kter\u00e9m Jan Dobrovsk\u00fd a Jind\u0159ich \u0160\u00eddlo rozeb\u00edrali tezi o nastupuj\u00edc\u00ed \u201enormalizaci 2.0\u201c. \u017dantovsk\u00fd toto vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed ozna\u010dil za nebezpe\u010dn\u00e9 a manipulativn\u00ed, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e poznamenal, \u017ee i s\u00e1m \u0160\u00eddlo si uv\u011bdomuje problemati\u010dnost vkl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed star\u00fdch pojm\u016f do nov\u00fdch souvislost\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Podle \u017dantovsk\u00e9ho se oba akt\u00e9\u0159i podcastu shodovali v obav\u011b, \u017ee sou\u010dasn\u00e1 vl\u00e1dn\u00ed garnitura v \u010dele s Andrejem Babi\u0161em a Sn\u011bmovna veden\u00e1 Tomiem Okamurou usiluj\u00ed o destrukci liber\u00e1ln\u00ed demokracie a nastolen\u00ed autokracie skrze ovl\u00e1dnut\u00ed ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edch i komer\u010dn\u00edch m\u00e9di\u00ed. Analytik citoval jejich obavy z vytvo\u0159en\u00ed \u201emedi\u00e1ln\u00ed spir\u00e1ly ml\u010den\u00ed\u201c. Zam\u011bstnanci m\u00e9di\u00ed by pr\u00fd mohli podlehnout strachu v duchu hesla: \u201eKdo nejde s n\u00e1mi, jde proti n\u00e1m.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u017dantovsk\u00fd v\u0161ak tyto \u00favahy r\u00e1zn\u011b odm\u00edtl jako neopodstatn\u011bn\u00e9. \u201eTohle paranoidn\u00ed tlach\u00e1n\u00ed t\u011bch dvou p\u00e1n\u016f samoz\u0159ejm\u011b vn\u00e1\u0161\u00ed do spole\u010densk\u00e9ho diskurzu um\u011blou, nesmyslnou a neopodstatn\u011bnou obavu z toho, \u017ee tato vl\u00e1da m\u00e1 v \u00famyslu zato\u010dit s medi\u00e1ln\u00ed odezvou a vytvo\u0159it si nedotknutelnost,\u201c uvedl medi\u00e1ln\u00ed expert.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V kontrastu s t\u011bmito obavami \u017dantovsk\u00fd p\u0159ipomn\u011bl p\u016fsoben\u00ed p\u0159edchoz\u00ed vl\u00e1dy Petra Fialy, kter\u00e1 si podle n\u011bj m\u00e9dia podmanila mnohem v\u00fdrazn\u011bji. Uvedl, \u017ee p\u0159i sledov\u00e1n\u00ed diskusn\u00edch po\u0159ad\u016f \u010cesk\u00e9 televize m\u00e1 div\u00e1k st\u00e1le pocit, \u017ee instituce funguje jako \u201ehl\u00e1sn\u00e1 trouba\u201c minul\u00e9 vl\u00e1dn\u00ed koalice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jako konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edklad selh\u00e1n\u00ed objektivity zm\u00ednil debatu mezi Petrem Pavlem a Andrejem Babi\u0161em p\u0159ed posledn\u00ed prezidentskou volbou. Souboj dvou kandid\u00e1t\u016f moderoval Martin \u0158ezn\u00ed\u010dek. Podle \u017dantovsk\u00e9ho moder\u00e1tor \u201ezcela jednozna\u010dn\u011b dr\u017eel z\u00e1da Pavlovi a velmi zda\u0159ile okop\u00e1val kotn\u00edky Babi\u0161ovi\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Na podporu sv\u00fdch tvrzen\u00ed se analytik odvolal na anal\u00fdzu Fakulty soci\u00e1ln\u00edch v\u011bd Univerzity Karlovy, kterou vypracoval profesor Jan Jir\u00e1k. \u017dantovsk\u00fd interpretoval z\u00e1v\u011bry t\u00e9to studie jako potvrzen\u00ed naprost\u00e9ho poru\u0161en\u00ed objektivity a nestrannosti ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edho m\u00e9dia. Vyj\u00e1d\u0159il politov\u00e1n\u00ed nad t\u00edm, \u017ee se tento ne\u0161var v redakci zpravodajstv\u00ed a publicistiky hluboce usadil a nikdo zevnit\u0159 televize nejev\u00ed z\u00e1jem na zm\u011bn\u011b tohoto stavu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u017dantovsk\u00fd ozna\u010dil varov\u00e1n\u00ed Dobrovsk\u00e9ho a \u0160\u00eddla p\u0159ed ztr\u00e1tou svobody m\u00e9di\u00ed za l\u017eiv\u00e9 a \u00fa\u010delov\u00e9. \u201eJestli\u017ee tady te\u010f Dobrovsk\u00fd se \u0160\u00eddlem stra\u0161\u00ed ztr\u00e1tou svobody v\u0161ech m\u00e9di\u00ed, tak asi v\u011bd\u00ed, pro\u010d to d\u011blaj\u00ed, jak\u00fd c\u00edl sleduj\u00ed nebo jak\u00fd z\u00e1jem maj\u00ed. Ka\u017edop\u00e1dn\u011b j\u00e1 konstatuji, \u017ee to je le\u017e,\u201c \u0159ekl expert.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Krou\u017ekovou platit nechci. Mysl\u00ed si, \u017ee je privilegovan\u00e1<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Medi\u00e1ln\u00ed analytik se vyj\u00e1d\u0159il tak\u00e9 k pr\u00e1ci moder\u00e1torky Barbory Krou\u017ekov\u00e9, kter\u00e1 po sta\u017een\u00ed z hlavn\u00edch zpravodajsk\u00fdch relac\u00ed a n\u00e1sledn\u00e9m p\u016fsoben\u00ed v po\u0159adech Interview \u010cT24 \u010di 90′ \u010cT24 z \u010cesk\u00e9 televize definitivn\u011b odch\u00e1z\u00ed<\/strong><\/a> do t\u00fdden\u00edku Respekt. \u017dantovsk\u00fd v t\u00e9to souvislosti upozornil na jej\u00ed kampa\u0148 proti \u0159editeli divize zpravodajstv\u00ed Petru Mrzenovi, jemu\u017e Krou\u017ekov\u00e1 vy\u010d\u00edt\u00e1, \u017ee se k n\u00ed \u201enechoval hezky\u201c. Podle analytika je absurdn\u00ed, aby se ve\u0159ejnost zab\u00fdvala n\u00e1\u0159ky jedn\u00e9 redaktorky. Kritizoval neschopnost n\u011bkter\u00fdch zam\u011bstnanc\u016f ct\u00edt z\u00e1kladn\u00ed hierarchii a pr\u00e1vo zam\u011bstnavatele rozhodovat o person\u00e1ln\u00edm slo\u017een\u00ed instituce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Medi\u00e1ln\u00ed expert v t\u00e9to souvislosti p\u0159ipomn\u011bl zn\u00e1m\u00fd v\u00fdrok Karla Schwarzenberga, \u017ee \u201e\u010cesk\u00e1 televize pat\u0159\u00ed t\u011bm, kte\u0159\u00ed v n\u00ed pracuj\u00ed\u201c<\/strong> – TO JE ALE P\u00cd\u010cOVINA, KDY\u017d MY SI TO MUS\u00cdME PLATIT!!!<\/em><\/strong>, jen\u017e podle n\u011bj v redakci zapustil nebezpe\u010dn\u011b hlubok\u00e9 ko\u0159eny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eLid\u00e9 jako pan\u00ed Krou\u017ekov\u00e1 maj\u00ed pocit, \u017ee jsou n\u011bjak\u00fdm vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm bo\u017estvem privilegov\u00e1ni a maj\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed pr\u00e1vo rozhodovat sami o sob\u011b a o tom, jak bude instituce, pro kterou pracuj\u00ed a kde maj\u00ed pracovn\u00ed smlouvu, fungovat,\u201c uvedl analytik s t\u00edm, \u017ee jde o nep\u0159\u00edpustn\u00e9 p\u0159en\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed viny za vlastn\u00ed selh\u00e1n\u00ed na veden\u00ed televize.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kritika sm\u011b\u0159ovala i k samotn\u00e9mu stylu pr\u00e1ce Krou\u017ekov\u00e9, kter\u00fd \u017dantovsk\u00fd ozna\u010dil za jednostrann\u00fd a \u010dasto p\u0159ipom\u00ednaj\u00edc\u00ed sp\u00ed\u0161e v\u00fdslech ne\u017e rozhovor, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e odk\u00e1zal na jej\u00ed ned\u00e1vn\u00e9 vystoupen\u00ed<\/strong><\/a> s Liborem Vondr\u00e1\u010dkem ze Svobodn\u00fdch. Analytik konstatoval, \u017ee mu moder\u00e1torka v televizi nebude chyb\u011bt, a ironicky dodal, \u017ee v redakci Respektu \u010di ve Foru24 pro jej\u00ed \u201enestrann\u00e9\u201c n\u00e1zory jist\u011b najdou pochopen\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u017dantovsk\u00fd se v\u011bnoval tak\u00e9 financov\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edho m\u00e9dia. Zd\u016fraznil, \u017ee \u201emajiteli\u201c televize jsou ve skute\u010dnosti koncesion\u00e1\u0159i, kte\u0159\u00ed by m\u011bli m\u00edt pr\u00e1vo rozhodovat o tom, koho ze sv\u00fdch kapes plat\u00ed. <\/strong> A H\u0147UP KLEPMP\u00cd\u0158 JE FAKT ASI STB\u00c1K, KDY\u017d JIM JDE NA RUKU- MOTORIST\u00c9 SOB\u011a, VZPAMATUJTE SE, KOHO STRK\u00c1TE NA MINISTERSTVA A BABI\u0160 SE POTAJ\u00cd, ALE HOOODN\u011a SM\u011aJE!!!<\/em><\/strong> Pr\u00e1v\u011b existence zam\u011bstnanc\u016f typu Krou\u017ekov\u00e9 je podle n\u011bj \u201epodstatn\u00fd argument pro zru\u0161en\u00ed koncesion\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdch poplatk\u016f\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nejnov\u011bj\u0161\u00ed vyd\u00e1n\u00ed sv\u00e9 rubriky uzav\u0159el rezolutn\u00edm prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00edm: \u201eMy jsme majitel\u00e9 t\u00e9to televize a m\u011bli bychom m\u00edt pr\u00e1vo rozhodovat o tom, koho plat\u00edme. A j\u00e1 pan\u00ed Krou\u017ekovou platit nechci.\u201c<\/strong> A J\u00c1 A NADPOLOVI\u010cN\u00cd, A\u017d NADDVOUT\u0158ETINOV\u00c1 POPULACE \u010cR TAKY nechci\/nechceme! <\/em><\/strong>Asi i v\u00edce, ale nejsou p\u0159ipu\u0161t\u011bni do m\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9dyj\u00ed!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

JE JEN JEDIN\u00c1 CESTA- PRIVATIZACE! JIN\u00c9 TELEVIZE VZNIKLY „NA ZELEN\u00c9 LOUCE“ A PROSPERUJ\u00cd. TAHLE \u010cT A \u010cRo BY \u0160LY DO PRIVATIZACE JAKO BOHAT\u00c9 NEV\u011aSTY. SICE PAK BUDEME MUSTE TRP\u011aT VE V\u0160ECH FILMECH OTRAVN\u00c9 REKLAMY NA HOVNA, VLO\u017dKY A SRA\u010cKY (KVALITN\u00cd V\u00ddROBKY VLEZLOU STUPIDN\u00cd REKLAMU S DEBILN\u00cdMI PRAVDOL\u00c1SKA\u0158SK\u00ddMI H\u00c9\u00c9\u00c9RE\u010cKAMI A HEEERCI V\u016eBEC NEPOT\u0158EBUJ\u00cd), ALE P\u0158E\u017dIJEME TO A SNAD BUDEME KONE\u010cN\u011a BEZ SK\u0158\u00cdP\u011aN\u00cd ZUB\u016e\/PROT\u00c9Z SLEDOVAT DEBATY POLYTYK\u016e <\/em><\/strong>BEZ BLIC\u00cdCH PYTL\u00cdK\u016e….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u010cT, jakou si vysnil Jakub \u017delezn\u00fd. Petr \u017dantovsk\u00fd m\u00e1 pro n\u011bj \u0161patn\u00e9 zpr\u00e1vy 28.02.2026 8:32 | Koment\u00e1\u0159 autor: Jan Novotn\u00fd T\u00ddDEN V M\u00c9DI\u00cdCH Vl\u00e1da Petra Fialy u\u017e skon\u010dila, ale \u010cesk\u00e1 televize st\u00e1le funguje jako jej\u00ed \u201ehl\u00e1sn\u00e1 trouba\u201c. \u201eMajiteli\u201c \u010cesk\u00e9 televize jsou koncesion\u00e1\u0159i, kte\u0159\u00ed by m\u011bli rozhodovat o obsahu vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed i o tom, koho ze sv\u00fdch kapes … Pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed textu Motorist\u00e9 sob\u011b, to si neum\u00edte Klemp\u00ed\u0159e vychovat? P\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b se do PS nepod\u00edv\u00e1te!<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23042","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-koment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23042","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23042"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23042\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23051,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23042\/revisions\/23051"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23042"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23042"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23042"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}