{"id":23951,"date":"2026-05-06T10:13:58","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T09:13:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/?p=23951"},"modified":"2026-05-06T10:14:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T09:14:11","slug":"tady-mate-tu-vasi-spravedlnost-mafie-je-to-mluvi-ze-mne-osobni-zkusenost-z-31-7-1979","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/?p=23951","title":{"rendered":"Tady m\u00e1te tu va\u0161i spravedlnost! Mafie je to! Mluv\u00ed ze mn\u011b osobn\u00ed zku\u0161enost z 31.7.1979!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Soudce odsoudil, ale \u0159ekl to nahlas. Kdo v \u010cesku skute\u010dn\u011b rozhoduje? \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo odhalilo v\u00edc, ne\u017e se \u010dekalo<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p>06.05.2026 8:00 | Monitoring<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>autor:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/redakce\/redakce\/\"><strong>Karel V\u00fdborn\u00fd<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Kauza \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo znovu otev\u0159ela ot\u00e1zku, kam a\u017e m\u016f\u017ee zaj\u00edt odvolac\u00ed soud, kdy\u017e ru\u0161\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed soudu prvn\u00ed instance. Soudce Jan \u0160ott odsoudil Janu Nagyovou, ale sou\u010dasn\u011b dal najevo, \u017ee podle jeho sen\u00e1tu p\u0159etrv\u00e1vaj\u00ed pochybnosti. Jen\u017ee nejde o izolovan\u00fd spor jednoho soudce s vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed instanc\u00ed. \u010cesk\u00e1 justice u\u017e v minulosti \u0159e\u0161ila p\u0159\u00edpady, v nich\u017e zazn\u00edvalo podez\u0159en\u00ed, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed soud fakticky nep\u0159ezkoum\u00e1v\u00e1 rozsudek, ale diktuje jeho v\u00fdsledek. A n\u011bkdy dokonce opa\u010dn\u00fdm sm\u011brem \u2013 nikoli k vin\u011b, ale ke zpro\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cms.parlamentnilisty.cz\/image.ashx?w=632&amp;h=307&amp;f=sott-634701955199068043.jpg&amp;id=4363\" alt=\"Soudce odsoudil, ale \u0159ekl to nahlas. Kdo v \u010cesku skute\u010dn\u011b rozhoduje? \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo odhalilo v\u00edc, ne\u017e se \u010dekalo\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><small>Foto:&nbsp;<strong>Ladislav Carda<\/strong><br>Popisek:&nbsp;<strong>Soudce Jan \u0160ott<\/strong><\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kauza \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo m\u00e1 za sebou dal\u0161\u00ed dramatick\u00fd obrat. M\u011bstsk\u00fd soud v Praze uznal Janu Nagyovou vinnou, sou\u010dasn\u011b v\u0161ak soudce Jan \u0160ott p\u0159i od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed rozsudku&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.novinky.cz\/clanek\/krimi-odsoudil-ale-nesouhlasi-soudce-sott-v-kauze-capi-hnizdo-trva-na-nevine-nagyove-40576522\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">pronesl slova<\/a><\/strong>, kter\u00e1 v justi\u010dn\u00edm prost\u0159ed\u00ed vyvolala mimo\u0159\u00e1dnou pozornost. Soudce toti\u017e uvedl, \u017ee sen\u00e1t je nad\u00e1le p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den, \u017ee Nagyov\u00e1 by odsouzena b\u00fdt nem\u011bla, proto\u017ee o jej\u00ed vin\u011b p\u0159etrv\u00e1vaj\u00ed d\u016fvodn\u00e9 pochybnosti. Dodal ale, \u017ee m\u011bstsk\u00fd soud je v\u00e1z\u00e1n n\u00e1zorem Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Praze.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/profily\/profil.aspx?id=156527\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/profily-sprava\/user-data\/9B7F9A0D\/image\/156527-nagyov%C3%A1_profil_top.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/profily\/profil.aspx?id=156527\">Ing. Jana Nagyov\u00e1, Ph.D.<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ANO 2011<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>europoslankyn\u011b<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Jin\u00fdmi slovy: soudce rozhodl o vin\u011b, ale z\u00e1rove\u0148 ve\u0159ejn\u011b sd\u011blil, \u017ee podle jeho vlastn\u00edho hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkazn\u00ed situace k takov\u00e9mu z\u00e1v\u011bru doj\u00edt nem\u011bla. Pr\u00e1v\u011b tato otev\u0159enost vyvolala ot\u00e1zku, zda se soud prvn\u00ed instance v podobn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech nest\u00e1v\u00e1 pouze vykonavatelem n\u00e1zoru vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed instance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nejde p\u0159itom o b\u011b\u017enou procesn\u00ed situaci, kdy odvolac\u00ed soud ni\u017e\u0161\u00edmu soudu vytkne pr\u00e1vn\u00ed chybu, ne\u00fapln\u00e9 dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed nebo vadn\u00e9 od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed. Takov\u00fd postup je sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed soudn\u00ed soustavy. Probl\u00e9m nast\u00e1v\u00e1 ve chv\u00edli, kdy se spor net\u00fdk\u00e1 jen v\u00fdkladu pr\u00e1va, ale samotn\u00e9ho hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f. Tedy ot\u00e1zky, zda sv\u011bdek p\u016fsob\u00ed v\u011brohodn\u011b, zda listiny potvrzuj\u00ed ur\u010ditou verzi skutku, zda pochybnosti je\u0161t\u011b existuj\u00ed, nebo u\u017e byly rozpt\u00fdleny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1v\u011b to je v trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b citliv\u00e9. Soud prvn\u00ed instance d\u016fkazy prov\u00e1d\u00ed bezprost\u0159edn\u011b. Vid\u00ed sv\u011bdky, sly\u0161\u00ed jejich v\u00fdpov\u011bdi, sleduje jejich reakce, konfrontuje je s dal\u0161\u00edmi d\u016fkazy. Odvolac\u00ed soud naopak \u010dasto pracuje p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm se spisem a z\u00e1znamem toho, co u\u017e prob\u011bhlo. M\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo ni\u017e\u0161\u00ed soud kontrolovat, ale ot\u00e1zka zn\u00ed: m\u016f\u017ee mu tak\u00e9 fakticky na\u0159\u00eddit, jak m\u00e1 d\u016fkazy vylo\u017eit?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u0159itom soudce \u0160ott v kauze \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo rozhodoval u\u017e pot\u0159et\u00ed. Dvakr\u00e1t p\u0159edt\u00edm ob\u017ealobu zprostil, vrchn\u00ed soud v\u0161ak oba rozsudky zru\u0161il.&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.novinky.cz\/clanek\/domaci-rozhodnuti-soudce-v-kauze-capi-hnizdo-bylo-unikatni-a-nezvykle-otevrene-zni-z-justice-40576590\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Prezident Soudcovsk\u00e9 unie Libor V\u00e1vra ozna\u010dil<\/a><\/strong>&nbsp;otev\u0159enost \u0160ottova postupu za unik\u00e1tn\u00ed pr\u00e1v\u011b proto, \u017ee se nejde jen o v\u00e1zanost pr\u00e1vn\u00edm n\u00e1zorem, ale o ot\u00e1zku hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010cesk\u00e1 judikatura toti\u017e dlouho pracovala s t\u00edm, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed soud nem\u016f\u017ee jednodu\u0161e vnutit soudu prvn\u00edho stupn\u011b vlastn\u00ed skutkov\u00fd z\u00e1v\u011br, pokud s\u00e1m d\u016fkazy neprovedl nebo nezopakoval. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud v minulosti formuloval hranice velmi jasn\u011b: odvolac\u00ed soud nesm\u00ed soudu prvn\u00edho stupn\u011b ulo\u017eit, aby u\u010dinil konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed skutkov\u00e9 zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed, aby ur\u010dit\u00fd d\u016fkaz hodnotil konkr\u00e9tn\u00edm zp\u016fsobem nebo aby dosp\u011bl k p\u0159edem ur\u010den\u00e9mu skutkov\u00e9mu stavu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sou\u010dasn\u011b v\u0161ak Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud upozor\u0148uje, \u017ee opa\u010dn\u00fd extr\u00e9m tak\u00e9 neplat\u00ed. Hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f nen\u00ed nedotknutelnou dom\u00e9nou soudu prvn\u00ed instance, do n\u00ed\u017e by odvolac\u00ed soud nesm\u011bl v\u016fbec zas\u00e1hnout. Odvolac\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/sbirka.nsoud.cz\/sbirka\/21602\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">podle Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu<\/a><\/strong>&nbsp;p\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1 i p\u0159ezkum skutkov\u00fdch zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed a hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f. Jin\u00fdmi slovy: odvolac\u00ed soud m\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo \u0159\u00edct, \u017ee \u00favahy ni\u017e\u0161\u00edho soudu jsou nelogick\u00e9, ne\u00fapln\u00e9 nebo v rozporu s proveden\u00fdmi d\u016fkazy. Nem\u011bl by se v\u0161ak st\u00e1t soudem, kter\u00fd bezprost\u0159edn\u00ed hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f nahrad\u00ed vlastn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edkazem k v\u00fdsledku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Do t\u00e9to k\u0159ehk\u00e9 rovnov\u00e1hy vstoupil i n\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu IV. \u00daS 2980\/22. Ten se zab\u00fdval situac\u00ed, kdy&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/mezisoudy.cz\/databaze-judikatury\/detail-rozhodnuti\/8ea2b90a-92a8-11ee-b597-2cea7f51f963_i-us-1365-21-1-pravo-na-soudni-ochranu-pri-vraceni-veci-odvolacim-soudem-v-trestnim-rizeni\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">opakovan\u00e9 vracen\u00ed v\u011bci<\/a><\/strong>&nbsp;mezi instancemi vedlo k takzvan\u00e9mu&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/advokatnidenik.cz\/2024\/09\/03\/konec-justicniho-ping-pongu-v-trestnim-rizeni\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">justi\u010dn\u00edmu ping-pongu<\/a><\/strong>. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.usoud.cz\/aktualne\/neustavni-soudni-ping-pong-vedl-k-odsouzeni-stezovatelky\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">tehdy popsal p\u0159\u00edpad<\/a><\/strong>, v n\u011bm\u017e do\u0161lo k n\u011bkolika zru\u0161uj\u00edc\u00edm rozhodnut\u00edm odvolac\u00edho soudu a opakovan\u00e9mu vracen\u00ed v\u011bci soudu prvn\u00edho stupn\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u010c\u00e1st pr\u00e1vn\u00ed ve\u0159ejnosti v tomto n\u00e1lezu vid\u00ed pokus zabr\u00e1nit nekone\u010dn\u00e9mu p\u0159ehazov\u00e1n\u00ed spisu mezi soudy. Jin\u00ed v n\u011bm ale spat\u0159uj\u00ed nebezpe\u010dn\u00fd posun. Advok\u00e1tn\u00ed den\u00edk k tomu v odborn\u00e9m textu napsal, \u017ee \u00dastavn\u00ed soud dal za pravdu st\u011b\u017eovatelce, kter\u00e1 nam\u00edtala, \u017ee odvolac\u00ed soud na prvoinstan\u010dn\u00ed soud vyv\u00edjel ne\u00fastavn\u00ed tlak, v jeho\u017e d\u016fsledku soud prvn\u00edho stupn\u011b \u201ekapituloval\u201c a uznal ji vinnou.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Advok\u00e1t Luk\u00e1\u0161 Trojan&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ceska-justice.cz\/2025\/06\/odvolaci-soud-muze-prikazat-uznat-babise-vinnym-je-to-nebezpecne-varuje-advokat-trojan\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">v \u010cesk\u00e9 justici upozornil<\/a><\/strong>, \u017ee v kauze \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo odvolac\u00ed soud dosp\u011bl k z\u00e1v\u011bru o vin\u011b Andreje Babi\u0161e a Jany Nagyov\u00e9 a zav\u00e1zal k tomuto n\u00e1zoru soud prvn\u00edho stupn\u011b, proto\u017ee s\u00e1m je po p\u0159edchoz\u00edm zpro\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed nem\u016f\u017ee odsoudit. Podle Trojana takov\u00fd postup judikatura \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu umo\u017e\u0148uje, sou\u010dasn\u011b jej ale ozna\u010dil za nebezpe\u010dn\u00fd, proto\u017ee podle n\u011bj oslabuje roli nal\u00e9zac\u00edho soudu a dot\u00fdk\u00e1 se z\u00e1kazu zhor\u0161en\u00ed postaven\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Je\u0161t\u011b ost\u0159ej\u0161\u00ed stanovisko zaujal docent Vladim\u00edr Pelc z Pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 fakulty Univerzity Karlovy.&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.info.cz\/zpravodajstvi-a-komentare\/docent-pelc-capi-hnizdo-prikaz-k-uznani-viny\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Pro INFO.CZ \u0159ekl<\/a><\/strong>, \u017ee p\u0159\u00edkaz odvolac\u00edho soudu k uzn\u00e1n\u00ed viny pova\u017euje za proti\u00fastavn\u00ed. Podle n\u011bj m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt z\u00e1vazn\u00fd pr\u00e1vn\u00ed n\u00e1zor odvolac\u00edho soudu, ale nikoli p\u0159\u00edkaz, aby soud prvn\u00edho stupn\u011b ob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho uznal vinn\u00fdm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Debata tak u\u017e d\u00e1vno nen\u00ed jen o jednom rozsudku v jedn\u00e9 politicky sledovan\u00e9 kauze. Otev\u00edr\u00e1 se ot\u00e1zka, zda \u010desk\u00e9 trestn\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed nevytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed hybridn\u00ed model, v n\u011bm\u017e odvolac\u00ed soud fakticky rozhodne o vin\u011b, ale form\u00e1ln\u011b ponech\u00e1 podpis pod rozsudkem soudu prvn\u00ed instance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A pr\u00e1v\u011b zde se nab\u00edz\u00ed paralela, kter\u00e1 ukazuje, \u017ee probl\u00e9m nemus\u00ed m\u00edt jen jeden sm\u011br. Opa\u010dnou zku\u0161enost toti\u017e&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/arena\/monitor\/Soudci-z-Olomouce-doslovne-naridili-zprosteni-viny-meho-unosce-Odposlechy-dokazuji-ze-to-byl-plan-tvrdi-podnikatel-756152\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">dlouhodob\u011b popisuje<\/a><\/strong>&nbsp;moravsk\u00fd podnikatel Pavel Bur\u00e1\u0148. Ten tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee byl v roce 2014 unesen sv\u00fdm b\u00fdval\u00fdm spole\u010dn\u00edkem Jaroslavem Novotn\u00fdm a donucen podepsat dokumenty se stamilionov\u00fdmi dopady.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u0159\u00edpad je medi\u00e1ln\u011b zn\u00e1m\u00fd jako spor dvou protich\u016fdn\u00fdch verz\u00ed: podle Bur\u00e1n\u011b \u0161lo o \u00fanos a vyd\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed, podle Novotn\u00e9ho o dobrovoln\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed souvisej\u00edc\u00ed s podnikatelsk\u00fdm vypo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00edm. Bur\u00e1\u0148 v\u0161ak opakovan\u011b p\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1, \u017ee Krajsk\u00fd soud v Brn\u011b, pobo\u010dka ve Zl\u00edn\u011b, mu dvakr\u00e1t dal za pravdu a dosp\u011bl k z\u00e1v\u011bru o vin\u011b ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch. N\u00e1sledn\u011b v\u0161ak podle n\u011bj zas\u00e1hl Vrchn\u00ed soud v Olomouci takov\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem, \u017ee&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/arena\/rozhovory\/Unos-i-zprosteni-viny-unoscu-bylo-predem-domluveno-tvrdi-Buran-Dukazy-jsou-pry-ve-spisu-761542\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">prvoinstan\u010dn\u00ed soud nakonec rozhodl opa\u010dn\u011b<\/a><\/strong>&nbsp;a ob\u017ealovan\u00e9 zprostil. Pavel Bur\u00e1\u0148 dokonce tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee soudci z Olomouce podle n\u011bj \u201edoslovn\u011b na\u0159\u00eddili zpro\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed viny\u201c jeho \u00fadajn\u00e9ho \u00fanosce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To v\u0161ak Vrchn\u00ed soud v Olomouci odm\u00edt\u00e1 a sv\u016fj p\u0159\u00edstup h\u00e1j\u00ed t\u00edm, \u017ee d\u016fkazn\u00ed situace p\u0159ipou\u0161t\u011bla dv\u011b mo\u017en\u00e9 verze skutkov\u00e9ho d\u011bje, a soud proto musel postupovat podle z\u00e1sady in dubio pro reo, tedy v pochybnostech ve prosp\u011bch ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pr\u00e1v\u011b v tom je ale Bur\u00e1\u0148ova kauza zaj\u00edmav\u00e1. Zat\u00edmco v \u010cap\u00edm hn\u00edzd\u011b se mluv\u00ed o tom, zda odvolac\u00ed soud nem\u016f\u017ee dotla\u010dit prvoinstan\u010dn\u00ed soud k odsouzen\u00ed, v Bur\u00e1\u0148ov\u011b p\u0159\u00edpadu zazn\u00edv\u00e1 opa\u010dn\u00e9 podez\u0159en\u00ed:&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/arena\/monitor\/Unesli-me-a-dnes-bych-jim-mel-vyplatit-miliardu-Buran-se-brani-u-dalsiho-soudu-756339\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">zda odvolac\u00ed soud nem\u016f\u017ee prvoinstan\u010dn\u00ed soud dotla\u010dit ke zpro\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pokud soud prvn\u00ed instance po proveden\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f opakovan\u011b dosp\u011bje k jednomu z\u00e1v\u011bru, ale odvolac\u00ed soud mu opakovan\u011b \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee tento z\u00e1v\u011br neobstoj\u00ed, m\u016f\u017ee j\u00edt o legitimn\u00ed korekci. M\u016f\u017ee j\u00edt o ochranu ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch p\u0159ed vadn\u00fdm hodnocen\u00edm d\u016fkaz\u016f. M\u016f\u017ee j\u00edt o d\u016fsledek z\u00e1sady, \u017ee v pochybnostech se rozhoduje ve prosp\u011bch ob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ale m\u016f\u017ee tak\u00e9 vzniknout opa\u010dn\u00fd dojem: \u017ee soud, kter\u00fd m\u011bl d\u016fkazy v hlavn\u00edm l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed p\u0159ed sebou, je postupn\u011b zatla\u010den k v\u00fdsledku, s n\u00edm\u017e se vnit\u0159n\u011b neztoto\u017e\u0148uje. V jedn\u00e9 kauze k vin\u011b. V jin\u00e9 ke zpro\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nen\u00ed n\u00e1hodou, \u017ee t\u00e9ma se nyn\u00ed objevuje i v politicko-legislativn\u00ed rovin\u011b.&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.seznamzpravy.cz\/clanek\/domaci-kauzy-unik-z-kauzy-capi-hnizdo-babisuv-ministr-meni-nenapadny-paragraf-305469\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Seznam Zpr\u00e1vy informovaly<\/a><\/strong>, \u017ee ministr spravedlnosti Jeron\u00fdm Tejc chyst\u00e1 zm\u011bnu trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, kter\u00e1 by v\u00fdslovn\u011b \u0159e\u0161ila situace, kdy druhostup\u0148ov\u00fd soud v odvolac\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed ukl\u00e1d\u00e1 nal\u00e9zac\u00edmu soudu uznat vinu. Podle Seznam Zpr\u00e1v by \u00faprava m\u011bla sm\u011b\u0159ovat k tomu, aby odvolac\u00ed soud nemohl zav\u00e1zat soud prvn\u00ed instance k tomu, jak m\u00e1 hodnotit d\u016fkazy a jak\u00e1 skutkov\u00e1 zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed m\u00e1 u\u010dinit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/profily\/profil.aspx?id=275\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/profily-sprava\/user-data\/3161E215\/image\/115991-B70A2817_profil_top.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.parlamentnilisty.cz\/profily\/profil.aspx?id=275\">JUDr. Jeron\u00fdm Tejc<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ministr spravedlnosti<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>A\u0165 u\u017e bude konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed legislativn\u00ed n\u00e1vrh jak\u00fdkoli, jedno je z\u0159ejm\u00e9 u\u017e nyn\u00ed: kauza \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo znovu otev\u0159ela ot\u00e1zku, kter\u00e1 v \u010desk\u00e9 justici doutn\u00e1 dlouho. Jak zabr\u00e1nit nekone\u010dn\u00e9mu soudn\u00edmu ping-pongu, ale sou\u010dasn\u011b nezni\u010dit smysl soudu prvn\u00ed instance? Jak zajistit, aby odvolac\u00ed soud mohl napravovat chyby, ale nestal se skryt\u00fdm autorem rozsudku? A jak udr\u017eet d\u016fv\u011bru, \u017ee vina nebo nevina nejsou v\u00fdsledkem procesn\u00edho tlaku, ale skute\u010dn\u00e9ho, nez\u00e1visl\u00e9ho a p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010div\u011b od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00e9ho hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Soudce odsoudil, ale \u0159ekl to nahlas. Kdo v \u010cesku skute\u010dn\u011b rozhoduje? \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo odhalilo v\u00edc, ne\u017e se \u010dekalo 06.05.2026 8:00 | Monitoring autor:&nbsp;Karel V\u00fdborn\u00fd Kauza \u010cap\u00ed hn\u00edzdo znovu otev\u0159ela ot\u00e1zku, kam a\u017e m\u016f\u017ee zaj\u00edt odvolac\u00ed soud, kdy\u017e ru\u0161\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed soudu prvn\u00ed instance. Soudce Jan \u0160ott odsoudil Janu Nagyovou, ale sou\u010dasn\u011b dal najevo, \u017ee podle jeho &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/?p=23951\" class=\"more-link\">Pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed textu <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Tady m\u00e1te tu va\u0161i spravedlnost! Mafie je to! Mluv\u00ed ze mn\u011b osobn\u00ed zku\u0161enost z 31.7.1979!<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23951"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23951\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23952,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23951\/revisions\/23952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podivinsky.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}